My spontaneous theory on Arcade Fire's anti-hipster anthem "Rococo": I wasn't an art history major, but I seem to have an intuitive grasp of what "rococo" means. I know it was a movement in Western art that followed Baroque. Here is the difference, as I provisionally understand it, between Baroque and Rococo: Both are intricate, but Baroque intricacy is structural while Rococo intricacy is merely ornamental. In music, the highest incarnation of the Baroque is Johann Sebastian Bach, particularly his canons and fugues. The complexity of a Bach fugue is so staggering because it emerges organically from the iteration of simple musical premises and stringent laws of thematic development. Aside from the theme itself, very little in the fugue could have been otherwise. It has a fractal orderliness extending to its very core. A complex fugue may be marveled at, but its complexity beckons comprehension. It awaits the mind subtle enough to master it.
Rococo, in contrast, strives only to marvel those naïve enough to fall under its spell. Its melodies are not iterated rationally--they are merely garnished with ornamental curlicues designed to make them sound complex. Under its sheen of complexity, rococo is simple and trite. Rococo is meant to sound sophisticated in order to appeal to people who are trying to appear sophisticated.
Thus also with the modern kids, using great big words they don't understand. The fictionalized version of Lester Bangs portrayed by Philip Seymour Hoffman in Almost Famous says that "the only true currency in this world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." But that currency loses its value—or, to paraphrase Jesus of Nazareth, this salt of the earth loses its taste—when what was once uncool suddenly slingshots right straight into the heart of cooldom.
The Arcade Fire are not cool. For God's sake, just look at them: they're a bunch of dorks! From Canada! They're also probably the best band on the planet right now. Most really good music, especially nowadays, is made by people who are uncool. To make really good music, you have to spend a lot of time working on making music and not a lot of time out partying with the in-crowd or making friends. People who would choose to spend most of their time making music instead of socializing tend to be awkward and asocial by nature, which is to say uncool.
The same is true of sophistication in general: it is uncool. Sophistication means, in this context, unironic enthusiasm for things that take effort to understand. It's like the kid in third grade who sat on the swing reading The Giver during recess instead of playing four-square. Or at the very least it's like that group of four or five kids who broke out their Magic cards whenever they had a spare moment. In general, sophistication smacks of those kids who liked indoor recess better than outdoor recess.
In this respect, and in this respect only, I am proud to call myself a hipster. That is, I am proud to call myself a hipster inasmuch as by "hipster" I mean "uncool person who spends his time reading sophisticated books and listening to sophisticated music instead of making friends." Uncool sophistication devolves into cool counterfeit sophistication at every generation; don't worry, it'll pass. And until it does, we can all take comfort in knowing that just because you're a bunch of uncool dorks doesn't mean you can't be the best band on the planet.
no one would ever define hipster that way in a million years
ReplyDeletealso jesus christ stop caring about superficial and artificial metrics of 'coolness' that mostly are ways for people who don't know you to form snap judgments about you, you doltish image-obsessed hipster
do you want to know what the secret to being cool is?
1. Having enough self-identity and self-confidence not to give a fuck about other people's judgements about you (or at least enough self-control not to show it)
2. Spending time with people who find kinship with you rather than 'um, yeah, that person's not my type'
~fin~
Do you know how you accomplish #1?
By not being self-conscious about silly things like how you spend your free time, and condescendingly laughing at people who would judge you for it. Also stop thinking of them as cool for fuck's sake.
I know that you're still angry about the time that time in the 3rd grade when everybody laughed at you, but you're going to have to get over it sometime if you want to grow up, and things like the self-seclusion of "UGH THOSE LOSERS WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND TRUE KNOWLEDGE" and search-for-objectivity,-that-will-show-those-assholes "BEST BAND ON THE PLANET" language isn't helping matters.
What I'm saying is that if you're still comparing yourself and your pursuits to "cool" people, and you're still concerning yourself with someone else's definition of "cool" rather than making your own, THEY ARE WINNING. THEY ARE STILL GETTING TO YOU. THEY ARE INSIDE YOUR HEAD.
You're dangerously close to sounding like an atheist who has to make absolutely sure that I understand that while everyone is entitled to their delusions, you know for a fact that there is no God and can prove it to me right this instant. You're stuck in antithesis.
PS:
Like, seriously, think about Lil' Wayne for like 2 seconds. Having dedication to a craft means that you can't be 'normal' in certain respects but no one said it had to make you 'uncool', much less antisocial and awkward.